# content
Charles Hoskinson does not mince words. The man who helped start Ethereum before walking away to build Cardano has once again trained his sights on the network he left behind. In a CoinDesk interview just days ago, he painted a picture of a project that keeps repeating the same mistakes on governance and funding.

“If Ethereum was to just take 5% of protocol revenue and give it to the Ethereum Foundation, they’d have $390 million a year to work with,” he said, according to a report in Yahoo Finance. The figure lands like a challenge. It highlights what Hoskinson sees as a glaring gap. Ethereum lacks a built-in, on-chain treasury that could support development over decades. Instead it leans on a small circle of powerful organizations.

But the critique runs deeper. Hoskinson, who co-founded Ethereum before its 2015 launch, argues the network’s direction still rests too heavily with corporations and informal power structures. True decentralization, he insists, puts token holders in charge through on-chain votes. Anything less falls short. Cardano’s approach, slower by design, aims for exactly that kind of sustained accountability.

His comments come at a moment when the broader industry faces mounting pressure. Hacks keep happening. Users lose funds. Confidence erodes. And speed, that long-celebrated virtue of blockchain competition, suddenly looks less attractive. “People are starting to wake up, especially in the age of AI hacking where everything is getting broken, that speed to market is not necessarily the most desirable thing,” Hoskinson added in the same interview.

The timing feels pointed. Just before his latest remarks, a bridge tied to Cardano’s expanding side projects suffered a significant breach. Attackers drained roughly 515 million NIGHT tokens, worth about $13 million at the time, from a Wanchain-operated link between Cardano and BNB Chain. CryptoSlate detailed how the exploit hit infrastructure connected to Midnight, Cardano’s data-protection focused sidechain. The token plunged. Yet ADA itself rose nearly 8 percent in the aftermath, buoyed by optimism around a recent network upgrade.

Hoskinson didn’t call the incident a direct failure of Cardano’s core chain. He has stressed the project itself remains untouched. Still, the event sharpened his focus on what comes next. Insurance. Not as an afterthought but as a foundational layer the entire sector has ignored for too long.

He proposes optional coverage for wallets and bridges. Users would pay premiums into collateral-backed pools. Protocols that meet strict security benchmarks could qualify for protection. When incidents occur, victims receive compensation. The setup creates incentives for better code, stronger audits and higher standards across projects. “You need financial systems with rule of law and checks and balances and the ability to get restitution when bad things happen,” he told CoinDesk.

This vision extends far beyond one exploit. Hoskinson sees the industry’s next growth phase built on identity, privacy, insurance and connections to traditional finance. Faster transactions matter less than protections that ordinary people can trust. The message lands with force after years of spectacular failures that left retail investors burned.

Nor is this a new line of attack. Hoskinson has leveled similar charges before. At Token2049 in Singapore in September 2024 he went further, calling Ethereum a “dictatorship” centered on Vitalik Buterin. The project’s entire vision, he said, begins and ends with its remaining co-founder. Remove Buterin and the roadmap loses its anchor. Cointelegraph, via TradingView, captured the exchange in detail. Hoskinson contrasted that model with Cardano’s Voltaire-era changes. Those upgrades turned ADA into a governance token. Holders now elect delegates. Founding entities no longer hold unilateral power to trigger forks. An organization called Intersect brings researchers and engineers together without depending on any single personality.

The contrast reveals two philosophies. Ethereum embraced rapid iteration and layer-two scaling. Cardano chose peer-reviewed research and deliberate progress toward on-chain decision making. Both have delivered results. Ethereum dominates in total value locked and developer activity. Cardano points to its formal methods and growing treasury governance as proof of superior long-term architecture.

Critics inside the Cardano community sometimes push back. They note that its emphasis on governance has at times slowed feature delivery. Hoskinson himself addressed governance friction in May 2026 when he reviewed more than 11,000 decentralized autonomous organizations ahead of potential reforms. He signaled openness to serving as a delegated representative in future cycles. Coverage in Yahoo Finance from that period shows ongoing experimentation rather than a finished product.

Yet the core disagreement with Ethereum persists. Hoskinson has accused the Ethereum Foundation of borrowing ideas without credit, including elements of the extended unspent transaction output model that Cardano refined over a decade. A July 2026 report from Bitcoin Sistemi documented his latest claims on that front. Such accusations add heat to an already competitive relationship between the two networks.

Market reactions tell their own story. Ethereum’s price moves often reflect anticipation around upgrades like Pectra. Cardano’s token has shown resilience even after the recent bridge incident. Some observers interpret that as evidence that participants increasingly value the kinds of structural protections Hoskinson champions.

Still, talk alone will not settle the debate. Ethereum continues to attract institutional interest and maintains a massive developer community. Its foundation has defended its approach as flexible and merit-based rather than rigidly on-chain. Supporters argue that off-chain coordination among core teams has produced real innovation without the paralysis that sometimes accompanies pure token-holder votes.

Hoskinson sees a different future. One where insurance products become standard. Where governance includes clear rules for restitution. Where blockchains integrate with regulated financial rails instead of operating parallel to them. The recent NIGHT token incident, even if confined to bridge infrastructure, underscores the cost of operating without those safeguards. Millions vanished in hours. Users felt the pain directly.

So the question lingers. Can crypto mature without mechanisms that provide accountability when systems fail? Hoskinson’s answer is blunt. No. The industry must grow up. That process starts with honest assessments of where current models fall short. And few voices carry as much weight on that topic as a founder who helped shape one chain before dedicating his efforts to building what he believes is a better alternative.

His latest comments won’t end the Ethereum-Cardano rivalry. They sharpen it. They force participants on both sides to examine assumptions about speed versus safety, corporate influence versus token-holder power, and technical ambition versus institutional readiness. In a sector still recovering from repeated setbacks, those distinctions matter more than ever.

# contentMap.en
Charles Hoskinson does not mince words. The man who helped start Ethereum before walking away to build Cardano has once again trained his sights on the network he left behind. In a CoinDesk interview just days ago, he painted a picture of a project that keeps repeating the same mistakes on governance and funding.

“If Ethereum was to just take 5% of protocol revenue and give it to the Ethereum Foundation, they’d have $390 million a year to work with,” he said, according to a report in Yahoo Finance. The figure lands like a challenge. It highlights what Hoskinson sees as a glaring gap. Ethereum lacks a built-in, on-chain treasury that could support development over decades. Instead it leans on a small circle of powerful organizations.

But the critique runs deeper. Hoskinson, who co-founded Ethereum before its 2015 launch, argues the network’s direction still rests too heavily with corporations and informal power structures. True decentralization, he insists, puts token holders in charge through on-chain votes. Anything less falls short. Cardano’s approach, slower by design, aims for exactly that kind of sustained accountability.

His comments come at a moment when the broader industry faces mounting pressure. Hacks keep happening. Users lose funds. Confidence erodes. And speed, that long-celebrated virtue of blockchain competition, suddenly looks less attractive. “People are starting to wake up, especially in the age of AI hacking where everything is getting broken, that speed to market is not necessarily the most desirable thing,” Hoskinson added in the same interview.

The timing feels pointed. Just before his latest remarks, a bridge tied to Cardano’s expanding side projects suffered a significant breach. Attackers drained roughly 515 million NIGHT tokens, worth about $13 million at the time, from a Wanchain-operated link between Cardano and BNB Chain. CryptoSlate detailed how the exploit hit infrastructure connected to Midnight, Cardano’s data-protection focused sidechain. The token plunged. Yet ADA itself rose nearly 8 percent in the aftermath, buoyed by optimism around a recent network upgrade.

Hoskinson didn’t call the incident a direct failure of Cardano’s core chain. He has stressed the project itself remains untouched. Still, the event sharpened his focus on what comes next. Insurance. Not as an afterthought but as a foundational layer the entire sector has ignored for too long.

He proposes optional coverage for wallets and bridges. Users would pay premiums into collateral-backed pools. Protocols that meet strict security benchmarks could qualify for protection. When incidents occur, victims receive compensation. The setup creates incentives for better code, stronger audits and higher standards across projects. “You need financial systems with rule of law and checks and balances and the ability to get restitution when bad things happen,” he told CoinDesk.

This vision extends far beyond one exploit. Hoskinson sees the industry’s next growth phase built on identity, privacy, insurance and connections to traditional finance. Faster transactions matter less than protections that ordinary people can trust. The message lands with force after years of spectacular failures that left retail investors burned.

Nor is this a new line of attack. Hoskinson has leveled similar charges before. At Token2049 in Singapore in September 2024 he went further, calling Ethereum a “dictatorship” centered on Vitalik Buterin. The project’s entire vision, he said, begins and ends with its remaining co-founder. Remove Buterin and the roadmap loses its anchor. Cointelegraph, via TradingView, captured the exchange in detail. Hoskinson contrasted that model with Cardano’s Voltaire-era changes. Those upgrades turned ADA into a governance token. Holders now elect delegates. Founding entities no longer hold unilateral power to trigger forks. An organization called Intersect brings researchers and engineers together without depending on any single personality.

The contrast reveals two philosophies. Ethereum embraced rapid iteration and layer-two scaling. Cardano chose peer-reviewed research and deliberate progress toward on-chain decision making. Both have delivered results. Ethereum dominates in total value locked and developer activity. Cardano points to its formal methods and growing treasury governance as proof of superior long-term architecture.

Critics inside the Cardano community sometimes push back. They note that its emphasis on governance has at times slowed feature delivery. Hoskinson himself addressed governance friction in May 2026 when he reviewed more than 11,000 decentralized autonomous organizations ahead of potential reforms. He signaled openness to serving as a delegated representative in future cycles. Coverage in Yahoo Finance from that period shows ongoing experimentation rather than a finished product.

Yet the core disagreement with Ethereum persists. Hoskinson has accused the Ethereum Foundation of borrowing ideas without credit, including elements of the extended unspent transaction output model that Cardano refined over a decade. A July 2026 report from Bitcoin Sistemi documented his latest claims on that front. Such accusations add heat to an already competitive relationship between the two networks.

Market reactions tell their own story. Ethereum’s price moves often reflect anticipation around upgrades like Pectra. Cardano’s token has shown resilience even after the recent bridge incident. Some observers interpret that as evidence that participants increasingly value the kinds of structural protections Hoskinson champions.

Still, talk alone will not settle the debate. Ethereum continues to attract institutional interest and maintains a massive developer community. Its foundation has defended its approach as flexible and merit-based rather than rigidly on-chain. Supporters argue that off-chain coordination among core teams has produced real innovation without the paralysis that sometimes accompanies pure token-holder votes.

Hoskinson sees a different future. One where insurance products become standard. Where governance includes clear rules for restitution. Where blockchains integrate with regulated financial rails instead of operating parallel to them. The recent NIGHT token incident, even if confined to bridge infrastructure, underscores the cost of operating without those safeguards. Millions vanished in hours. Users felt the pain directly.

So the question lingers. Can crypto mature without mechanisms that provide accountability when systems fail? Hoskinson’s answer is blunt. No. The industry must grow up. That process starts with honest assessments of where current models fall short. And few voices carry as much weight on that topic as a founder who helped shape one chain before dedicating his efforts to building what he believes is a better alternative.

His latest comments won’t end the Ethereum-Cardano rivalry. They sharpen it. They force participants on both sides to examine assumptions about speed versus safety, corporate influence versus token-holder power, and technical ambition versus institutional readiness. In a sector still recovering from repeated setbacks, those distinctions matter more than ever.

# name
Hoskinson’s Sharp Rebuke: Why Ethereum’s Model Falls Short as Crypto Demands Real Accountability

# nameMap.en
Hoskinson’s Sharp Rebuke: Why Ethereum’s Model Falls Short as Crypto Demands Real Accountability

# preview.content
Charles Hoskinson does not mince words. The man who helped start Ethereum before walking away to build Cardano has once again trained his sights on the network he left behind. In a CoinDesk interview just days ago, he painted a picture of a project that keeps repeating the same mistakes on governance and funding.

“If Ethereum was to just take 5% of protocol revenue and give it to the Ethereum Foundation, they’d have $390 million a year to work with,” he said, according to a report in […]

# summary
Charles Hoskinson does not mince words. The man who helped start Ethereum before walking away to build Cardano has once again trained his sights on the network he left behind. In a CoinDesk interview just days ago, he painted a picture of a project that keeps repeating the same mistakes on governance and funding.

“If Ethereum was to just take 5% of protocol revenue and give it to the Ethereum Foundation, they’d have $390 million a year to work with,” he said, according to a report in […]

# summaryMap.en
Charles Hoskinson does not mince words. The man who helped start Ethereum before walking away to build Cardano has once again trained his sights on the network he left behind. In a CoinDesk interview just days ago, he painted a picture of a project that keeps repeating the same mistakes on governance and funding.

“If Ethereum was to just take 5% of protocol revenue and give it to the Ethereum Foundation, they’d have $390 million a year to work with,” he said, according to a report in […]