# content
Mark Jansen loves a new phone. For nearly a decade covering Android at Android Police, he has tracked every rumor, every launch event. The spectacle drew him in. Yet something shifted. Rumors now read like tales of compromise. Prices climb. Features feel familiar. Jansen decided. He won’t upgrade anytime soon. Not until Samsung, Google and the rest solve one stubborn problem.

Battery life. Simple as that. The component stuck in neutral while everything else raced ahead. Or tried to.

Smartphones matured faster than many expected. Processors no longer leave older models in the dust. Even Google’s Tensor chips deliver adequate speed. Displays hit high refresh rates and sharp resolutions across price tiers. Cameras capture decent shots in most conditions. The gap between a two-year-old flagship and the latest model narrowed. Consumers noticed. Data backs it up.

A 2025 survey from Allstate Protection Plans revealed the shift. Only 27 percent of Americans still upgrade every two years. Nearly a quarter now keep devices three or four years. Another 21 percent wait until hardware fails. The global average replacement cycle stretched to 2.4 years. Intentions point toward even longer ownership. TWICE reported these findings in February. The predictable rhythm of annual swaps broke.

And the reasons run deeper than personal preference. Hardware innovation hit limits. Manufacturers turned to software. Artificial intelligence became the new pitch. On-device models promise smarter photo editing, call summaries, productivity tools. Some features work well. Many feel half-baked. Crucially, they often roll out to older phones through updates. The incentive to buy new hardware weakens.

But AI demands resources. More RAM. Larger storage. Those components face soaring demand from data centers too. Prices jumped. Phone makers face tough choices. Raise prices outright. Cut corners elsewhere. Or blend both approaches. Jansen sees the third path as most likely. Small reductions in display quality or build materials. Modest price bumps. The result? Devices that feel like refined copies rather than leaps forward.

Samsung already explored cheaper panels for its Galaxy S27 series, according to reports cited in the Android Police piece. Other firms follow suit. The pattern repeats. Phones grow slightly better. They cost more. Excitement fades. “I won’t be buying a new phone for the foreseeable future — unless Samsung, Google, and other phone companies finally make the big update we’ve all been waiting for,” Jansen wrote.

His frustration echoes across the industry. A tech writer for Mirror.co.uk offered four reasons to skip upgrades in February 2025. Smartphones stagnated. Manufacturers grew lazy. They pushed gimmicky AI instead of meaningful hardware. “When was the last time we saw a truly innovative smartphone? I can’t remember,” the writer said. The article highlighted how most users ignore the AI extras. They’d rather grab apps from stores than pay premium for baked-in features. Mirror captured a sentiment gaining traction.

MakeUseOf contributor echoed the view months later. In September 2025 he skipped his usual two-year swap. His current phone worked fine. The 120Hz screen satisfied him. New AI tools left him skeptical. “The core reason why I don’t care about upgrading my phone this year is that my current phone works fine, and there’s nothing about phones coming out today that excites me,” he explained. MakeUseOf framed it as a personal turning point. Many readers likely nodded along.

Market data tells a broader story. Counterpoint Research noted a 9 percent sales drop in the Indian smartphone market early in 2026. Rising memory prices played a role. Premium devices held up better. Budget buyers delayed purchases. On X, users voiced parallel complaints. One post from April 2026 highlighted the slowdown. “Indian smartphone market is slowing down. Sales dropped 9% in early 2026 because phones are getting expensive.” Another from March observed that phones became necessities rather than novelties. Upgrade frequency naturally declined.

Yet the industry adapted in fits. Longer software support helped. Apple backs iPhones for five to six years. Samsung and Google now promise seven years on flagships. A three- or four-year-old device stays secure and functional. Battery replacement costs far less than a new handset. Many owners simply swap the cell and continue. The economic case for holding steady strengthens.

Environmental awareness grows too. Though surveys show attitudes don’t always match behavior, fewer upgrades mean less electronic waste. That appeals to a segment of buyers. GadgetDiary analyzed the Allstate data in February 2026. It questioned whether consumers grew smarter or simply faced fewer compelling reasons. “Maybe this is simply what happens when phones stop changing much, prices keep climbing, and the industry runs out of fresh reasons to demand everyone’s attention every 12 months,” the site observed. GearDiary captured the ambivalence.

Still, room for progress exists. Jansen points to batteries as the clearest opportunity. Samsung’s Galaxy S Ultra relied on the same 5,000mAh cell from 2020 through 2026. Six years. No meaningful increase. Chinese brands pushed silicon-carbon technology and larger capacities. OnePlus models delivered standout endurance before the brand’s challenges. Samsung tested silicon-carbon in the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. Insiders see it as a trial run for wider adoption.

The hesitation makes sense. Batteries involve safety risks. Samsung remembers past issues. Caution ruled. But with other avenues squeezed by component costs, batteries represent one of the few paths to genuine differentiation. Bigger cells. Faster charging. Better longevity. These improvements would register in daily use. They could justify the expense.

Jansen remains firm. He keeps his current device until such advances arrive in mainstream models from Samsung or Google. “Battery tech in most US phones has stagnated hard. Samsung’s Galaxy S Ultra phone has used the same 5,000mAh cell since it was introduced in 2020. That’s six years without real change, and that’s a very long time in smartphones,” he argued. The status quo fails to impress. Tweaked designs at higher prices? No thanks.

Analysts watch the trend with mixed feelings. Longer cycles pressure revenue for manufacturers and carriers. Verizon faces implications from slower upgrades, a Motley Fool podcast noted in late 2024. Protection plan sales may rise as owners maintain devices longer. Retailers pivot toward extended warranties and repair services. The market doesn’t collapse. It changes.

Some buyers still chase the newest models. Early adopters, roughly 22 percent, swap within 12 months. Status, cameras or specific AI features drive them. Most consumers differ. They prioritize reliability over novelty. A phone that lasts, receives updates and holds a charge meets their needs.

The coming years could prove bumpy. Cost pressures persist as long as AI demand stays high. Manufacturers might trim durability to hold prices. Or they might bet on battery breakthroughs. Jansen bets on the latter. If larger, more efficient cells become standard, his credit card comes out. Until then, his current phone stays put.

That stance resonates. Recent YouTube discussions labeled 2025 flagships as overhyped and boring. Specs no longer dazzle. Pricing feels steep. One video asked why anyone would upgrade when the prior model suffices for calls, maps, banking and streaming. The maturity of the category shows. Phones became excellent at basics years ago. Incremental gains struggle to excite.

So the upgrade cycle stretches. Three years. Four years. Sometimes longer. Software support extends the window. Battery swaps refresh aging hardware. And consumers grow selective. They demand real progress before spending hundreds or thousands again.

Jansen’s article crystallized a moment. Not every reader shares his battery obsession. Yet many share the fatigue with marginal updates and rising costs. The industry must respond. Better batteries offer one clear route. Improved durability, repairability or entirely new form factors could provide others. Foldables and under-display cameras once promised revolution. Delivery disappointed for many. The next chapter remains unwritten.

One fact stands clear. The era of feeling compelled to upgrade every year or two ended. Smartphones succeeded too well. They became reliable tools instead of must-have novelties. For industry insiders tracking sales forecasts and consumer surveys, this shift marks a permanent adjustment. Companies that adapt by delivering meaningful advances in the areas that matter will keep customers engaged. Those that coast on minor tweaks and marketing hype risk losing them. Jansen already made his choice. Plenty more follow his lead.

# contentMap.en
Mark Jansen loves a new phone. For nearly a decade covering Android at Android Police, he has tracked every rumor, every launch event. The spectacle drew him in. Yet something shifted. Rumors now read like tales of compromise. Prices climb. Features feel familiar. Jansen decided. He won’t upgrade anytime soon. Not until Samsung, Google and the rest solve one stubborn problem.

Battery life. Simple as that. The component stuck in neutral while everything else raced ahead. Or tried to.

Smartphones matured faster than many expected. Processors no longer leave older models in the dust. Even Google’s Tensor chips deliver adequate speed. Displays hit high refresh rates and sharp resolutions across price tiers. Cameras capture decent shots in most conditions. The gap between a two-year-old flagship and the latest model narrowed. Consumers noticed. Data backs it up.

A 2025 survey from Allstate Protection Plans revealed the shift. Only 27 percent of Americans still upgrade every two years. Nearly a quarter now keep devices three or four years. Another 21 percent wait until hardware fails. The global average replacement cycle stretched to 2.4 years. Intentions point toward even longer ownership. TWICE reported these findings in February. The predictable rhythm of annual swaps broke.

And the reasons run deeper than personal preference. Hardware innovation hit limits. Manufacturers turned to software. Artificial intelligence became the new pitch. On-device models promise smarter photo editing, call summaries, productivity tools. Some features work well. Many feel half-baked. Crucially, they often roll out to older phones through updates. The incentive to buy new hardware weakens.

But AI demands resources. More RAM. Larger storage. Those components face soaring demand from data centers too. Prices jumped. Phone makers face tough choices. Raise prices outright. Cut corners elsewhere. Or blend both approaches. Jansen sees the third path as most likely. Small reductions in display quality or build materials. Modest price bumps. The result? Devices that feel like refined copies rather than leaps forward.

Samsung already explored cheaper panels for its Galaxy S27 series, according to reports cited in the Android Police piece. Other firms follow suit. The pattern repeats. Phones grow slightly better. They cost more. Excitement fades. “I won’t be buying a new phone for the foreseeable future — unless Samsung, Google, and other phone companies finally make the big update we’ve all been waiting for,” Jansen wrote.

His frustration echoes across the industry. A tech writer for Mirror.co.uk offered four reasons to skip upgrades in February 2025. Smartphones stagnated. Manufacturers grew lazy. They pushed gimmicky AI instead of meaningful hardware. “When was the last time we saw a truly innovative smartphone? I can’t remember,” the writer said. The article highlighted how most users ignore the AI extras. They’d rather grab apps from stores than pay premium for baked-in features. Mirror captured a sentiment gaining traction.

MakeUseOf contributor echoed the view months later. In September 2025 he skipped his usual two-year swap. His current phone worked fine. The 120Hz screen satisfied him. New AI tools left him skeptical. “The core reason why I don’t care about upgrading my phone this year is that my current phone works fine, and there’s nothing about phones coming out today that excites me,” he explained. MakeUseOf framed it as a personal turning point. Many readers likely nodded along.

Market data tells a broader story. Counterpoint Research noted a 9 percent sales drop in the Indian smartphone market early in 2026. Rising memory prices played a role. Premium devices held up better. Budget buyers delayed purchases. On X, users voiced parallel complaints. One post from April 2026 highlighted the slowdown. “Indian smartphone market is slowing down. Sales dropped 9% in early 2026 because phones are getting expensive.” Another from March observed that phones became necessities rather than novelties. Upgrade frequency naturally declined.

Yet the industry adapted in fits. Longer software support helped. Apple backs iPhones for five to six years. Samsung and Google now promise seven years on flagships. A three- or four-year-old device stays secure and functional. Battery replacement costs far less than a new handset. Many owners simply swap the cell and continue. The economic case for holding steady strengthens.

Environmental awareness grows too. Though surveys show attitudes don’t always match behavior, fewer upgrades mean less electronic waste. That appeals to a segment of buyers. GadgetDiary analyzed the Allstate data in February 2026. It questioned whether consumers grew smarter or simply faced fewer compelling reasons. “Maybe this is simply what happens when phones stop changing much, prices keep climbing, and the industry runs out of fresh reasons to demand everyone’s attention every 12 months,” the site observed. GearDiary captured the ambivalence.

Still, room for progress exists. Jansen points to batteries as the clearest opportunity. Samsung’s Galaxy S Ultra relied on the same 5,000mAh cell from 2020 through 2026. Six years. No meaningful increase. Chinese brands pushed silicon-carbon technology and larger capacities. OnePlus models delivered standout endurance before the brand’s challenges. Samsung tested silicon-carbon in the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. Insiders see it as a trial run for wider adoption.

The hesitation makes sense. Batteries involve safety risks. Samsung remembers past issues. Caution ruled. But with other avenues squeezed by component costs, batteries represent one of the few paths to genuine differentiation. Bigger cells. Faster charging. Better longevity. These improvements would register in daily use. They could justify the expense.

Jansen remains firm. He keeps his current device until such advances arrive in mainstream models from Samsung or Google. “Battery tech in most US phones has stagnated hard. Samsung’s Galaxy S Ultra phone has used the same 5,000mAh cell since it was introduced in 2020. That’s six years without real change, and that’s a very long time in smartphones,” he argued. The status quo fails to impress. Tweaked designs at higher prices? No thanks.

Analysts watch the trend with mixed feelings. Longer cycles pressure revenue for manufacturers and carriers. Verizon faces implications from slower upgrades, a Motley Fool podcast noted in late 2024. Protection plan sales may rise as owners maintain devices longer. Retailers pivot toward extended warranties and repair services. The market doesn’t collapse. It changes.

Some buyers still chase the newest models. Early adopters, roughly 22 percent, swap within 12 months. Status, cameras or specific AI features drive them. Most consumers differ. They prioritize reliability over novelty. A phone that lasts, receives updates and holds a charge meets their needs.

The coming years could prove bumpy. Cost pressures persist as long as AI demand stays high. Manufacturers might trim durability to hold prices. Or they might bet on battery breakthroughs. Jansen bets on the latter. If larger, more efficient cells become standard, his credit card comes out. Until then, his current phone stays put.

That stance resonates. Recent YouTube discussions labeled 2025 flagships as overhyped and boring. Specs no longer dazzle. Pricing feels steep. One video asked why anyone would upgrade when the prior model suffices for calls, maps, banking and streaming. The maturity of the category shows. Phones became excellent at basics years ago. Incremental gains struggle to excite.

So the upgrade cycle stretches. Three years. Four years. Sometimes longer. Software support extends the window. Battery swaps refresh aging hardware. And consumers grow selective. They demand real progress before spending hundreds or thousands again.

Jansen’s article crystallized a moment. Not every reader shares his battery obsession. Yet many share the fatigue with marginal updates and rising costs. The industry must respond. Better batteries offer one clear route. Improved durability, repairability or entirely new form factors could provide others. Foldables and under-display cameras once promised revolution. Delivery disappointed for many. The next chapter remains unwritten.

One fact stands clear. The era of feeling compelled to upgrade every year or two ended. Smartphones succeeded too well. They became reliable tools instead of must-have novelties. For industry insiders tracking sales forecasts and consumer surveys, this shift marks a permanent adjustment. Companies that adapt by delivering meaningful advances in the areas that matter will keep customers engaged. Those that coast on minor tweaks and marketing hype risk losing them. Jansen already made his choice. Plenty more follow his lead.

# name
Why Smartphones Have Lost Their Spark: The Case for Holding Onto Your Current Device

# nameMap.en
Why Smartphones Have Lost Their Spark: The Case for Holding Onto Your Current Device

# preview.content
Mark Jansen loves a new phone. For nearly a decade covering Android at Android Police, he has tracked every rumor, every launch event. The spectacle drew him in. Yet something shifted. Rumors now read like tales of compromise. Prices climb. Features feel familiar. Jansen decided. He won’t upgrade anytime soon. Not until Samsung, Google and the rest solve one stubborn problem.

Battery life. Simple as that. The component stuck in neutral while everything else raced ahead. Or tried […]

# summary
Mark Jansen loves a new phone. For nearly a decade covering Android at Android Police, he has tracked every rumor, every launch event. The spectacle drew him in. Yet something shifted. Rumors now read like tales of compromise. Prices climb. Features feel familiar. Jansen decided. He won’t upgrade anytime soon. Not until Samsung, Google and the rest solve one stubborn problem.

Battery life. Simple as that. The component stuck in neutral while everything else raced ahead. Or tried […]

# summaryMap.en
Mark Jansen loves a new phone. For nearly a decade covering Android at Android Police, he has tracked every rumor, every launch event. The spectacle drew him in. Yet something shifted. Rumors now read like tales of compromise. Prices climb. Features feel familiar. Jansen decided. He won’t upgrade anytime soon. Not until Samsung, Google and the rest solve one stubborn problem.

Battery life. Simple as that. The component stuck in neutral while everything else raced ahead. Or tried […]